The huge cloud of particles and vapor blew north and west, detected and reported by operators at a Swedish nuclear power plant. The graphite caught fire (graphite is high grade coal) vaporizing some of the fission products. This produced an initial explosion that exposed lots of nuclear fuel to lots of water and a second explosion destroyed the reactor. During a scheduled power shutdown the operators decided to maintain electric power production by slowing down the flow of water to maintain steam temperature and pressure Fission heat production dropped, some of the tubes “went dry” the metal cans melted and the uranium chemically reacted with the water to form uranium oxide and hydrogen. Water was pumped through the space between the uranium slugs and the graphite holes. Metal tubes contained slugs of uranium metal were placed in the holes in the graphite block. The Chernobyl reactor was a graphite pile (pure solid carbon-think the United States Hanford, WA, plant that produced plutonium in the 1940s) block with horizontal holes uniformly spaced to slow the neutrons. This was reported to occur at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant on April 26, 1986. Worst-case nuclear reactor incidents would potentially release radioactive materials in the form of hot vapors. In the absence of the right purity or configuration, the initial energy released by a chain reaction will rapidly splat the heavy metals apart, too distant to continue the chain reaction. In the diluted forms (<80% U-235 or Pu-239), the fuel cannot explode in a nuclear chain reaction. Both U-235 and Pu-239 are >90% pure for bomb-grade applications compared to 3.4–5% the usual enrichment for nuclear reactor fuel. Storvick, in Sustainable Power Technologies and Infrastructure, 2016 Nuclear SafetyĪ nuclear core meltdown is considered the worst-case accident in a nuclear power plant. It is possible that with a large jet there may be some ablation of the vessel wall. The melt jet will fragment in the water of the bottom head, unless it is of 10 to 15 cm diameter, since according to Saito's correlation the break-up length should be 10 to 15 times the jet diameter. The hole ablation as the melt flows increases the jet diameter and the rate of the discharge of the melt to the bottom head. The melt relocation from the core region to the bottom head begins with failure of crust of the melt pool in the core region and the ablation of the core radial barrel cylinder or the core plate. Both of these events were investigated in turn, and the evaluation of these hazards required performance of experiments and development of models. If the melt relocates through the downcomer, as it did at TMI-2, there is a hazard of melt jet attack on the vessel wall, as well as that of a steam explosion in the bottom head. Material configuration and heat transfer processes at an intermediate state of melt progression, after initial major relocation event and before final steady state. The incident in Chernobyl occurred when technologists decided to use the commercial reactor to run an experiment and the experiment went wrong. The radioactive vapors settle to the Earth and result in radiation poisoning. The steam pressures and/or the explosion of the hydrogen can rupture the reactor vessel and allow radioactive vapors to escape. If the hot uranium contacts water, it can react to form hydrogen. In addition to the fuel rods melting, the heat passes to the water in the reactor this generates high pressures. In a meltdown, the chain reaction is not controlled, and reactor fuel temperatures increase until they melt. In the absence of high purity and proper configuration, the initial energy released by a chain reaction will rapidly “splat” the heavy metals too far apart to continue the chain reaction. In the diluted forms (<80% U-235 or Pu-239), the fuel cannot produce a powerful nuclear explosion. Both U-235 and Pu-239 must be >90% pure for bomb-grade of applications compared to 3% of the usual enrichment for nuclear reactor fuel. In Sustainable Nuclear Power, 2007 Nuclear SafetyĪ nuclear core meltdown is considered the worst-case accident in a nuclear power plant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |